What Will This Election Mean for America’s Metropolitan Agenda?


HERE’S AN EXCERPT FROM A GREAT POST by KAID BENFIELD on NRDC’s SWITCHBOARD BLOG.  CLICK HERE FOR THE WHOLE POST…

(BENFIELD) Here’s a little about what this week’s historic election may mean for smart growth, sustainable development, and metropolitan America, based on Barack Obama’s statements and literature.  There is ample reason to believe that the president-elect has a better understanding of these issues than any other modern president.

The effect of land use on transportation & oil

First, his campaign’s position paper on oil security and energy independenceexplicitly recognizes the benefits of smart growth:

“Over the longer term, we know that the amount of fuel we will use is directly related to our land use decisions and development patterns, much of which have been organized around the principle of cheap gasoline. Barack Obama believes that we must move beyond our simple fixation of investing so many of our transportation dollars in serving drivers and that we must make more investments that make it easier for us to walk, bicycle and access transportation alternatives.”

Importantly, Obama has also stressed that energy conservation should be made one of the explicit goals of the transportation planning required of metropolitan regions in order to secure federal dollars for roads, transit, and related projects.  And he has indicated his support for leveling the tax subsidies afforded to employers who now may spend and deduct twice the amount, per employee, for automobile parking that they may spend on transit, carpooling or vanpooling. 

The new metropolitan reality

Beyond the campaign literature, Obama gave a major address to the US Conference of Mayors in June, during which he showed that he gets it about the challenge of addressing growth at the metropolitan scale:

“The change that’s taking place today is as great as any we’ve seen in more than a century, since the time when cities grew upward and outward with immigrants escaping poverty, and tyranny, and misery abroad. Our population has grown by tens of millions in the past few decades, and it’s projected to grow nearly 50% more in the decades to come. And this growth isn’t just confined to our cities, it’s happening in our suburbs, exurbs, and throughout our metropolitan areas.

“This is creating new pressures, but it’s also opening up new opportunities – because it’s not just our cities that are hotbeds of innovation anymore, it’s those growing metro areas. It’s not just Durham or Raleigh – it’s the entire Research Triangle. It’s not just Palo Alto, it’s cities up and down Silicon Valley. The top 100 metro areas generate two-thirds of our jobs, nearly 80% of patents, and handle 75% of all seaport tonnage through ports like the one here in Miami. In fact, 42 of our metro areas now rank among the world’s 100 largest economies.

“To seize the possibility of this moment, we need to promote strong cities as the backbone of regional growth. And yet, Washington remains trapped in an earlier era, wedded to an outdated ‘urban’ agenda that focuses exclusively on the problems in our cities, and ignores our growing metro areas; an agenda that confuses anti-poverty policy with a metropolitan strategy, and ends up hurting both . . .

“Yes, we need to strengthen our cities. But we also need to stop seeing our cities as the problem and start seeing them as the solution. Because strong cities are the building blocks of strong regions, and strong regions are essential for a strong America. That is the new metropolitan reality and we need a new strategy that reflects it . . .”

Infrastructure, transit, and rail

In the same speech, Obama also endorsed some good ideas about transportation:

“I’ll also launch a National Infrastructure Reinvestment Bank that will invest $60 billion over ten years, and create nearly two million new jobs. The work will be determined by what will maximize our safety, security, Greater Greater Washington, creative commons license)and shared prosperity. Instead of building bridges to nowhere, let’s build communities that meet the needs and reflect the dreams of our families . . .

“Let’s invest that money in a world-class transit system. Let’s re-commit federal dollars to strengthen mass transit and reform our tax code to give folks a reason to take the bus instead of driving to work – because investing in mass transit helps make metro areas more livable and can help our regional economies grow. And while we’re at it, we’ll partner with our mayors to invest in green energy technology and ensure that your buses and buildings are energy efficient. And we’ll also invest in our ports, roads, and high-speed rails . . .”

(See also Matthew Iglesias’s commentary on this speech.)

While a lot of people, including yours truly, have been advocating these things, it’s worth noting that no other candidate this year, Democrat or Republican, addressed them this directly.  One has to go back to Al Gore’s speech at Brookings ten years ago to find a candidate (and Gore was not yet a candidate at the time) wanting to take on the issues of growth, development, and livable communities in a major address.

Recognition for Portland

In May, at a huge rally in Portland, Obama also served notice that he is aware of that region’s leadership on energy and transportation issues:

“If we are going to solve our energy problems we’ve got to think long term. It’s time for us to be serious about investing in alternative energy. It’s time for us to get serious about raising fuel efficiency standards on cars. It’s time that the entire country learn from what’s happening right here in Portland with mass transit and bicycle lanes and funding alternative means of transportation. That’s the kind of solution that we need for America.”

More on transportation

About.com has a very good and succinct summary of the president-elect’s views on transportation issues, drawn from various campaign statements, papers, and press reports.  It includes the following:

  • Obama’s position paper on urban policy includes plans to create a White House Office on Urban Policy, facilitate funding for strengthening urban infrastructure, restore funding for public works projects, and re-evaluate the transportation funding process with an eye toward smart growth.
  • Obama has favored continued government funding for Amtrak, which constantly comes under attack from opponents of subsidies for transit (never mind that the same politicos continue to support subsidies for highway expansion).
  • Obama wants to require states to create more bike lanes and pedestrian-friendly roads. He also proposes government funding to encourage the development of pedestrian-friendly infrastructure. The president-elect’s views are outlined in his fact sheet on transportation.

(As a non-partisan organization, NRDC does not endorse candidates.  But, now that we know who will be taking office on January 20, we can begin to look forward, at the environmental implications of the voters’ decisions.)

Advertisements

Posted on November 7, 2008, in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. 2 Comments.

  1. Nice writing. You are on my RSS reader now so I can read more from you down the road.

    Allen Taylor

  2. Just the info that I need, Thanks. I have learned a lot.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: