Michael Lewyn is an assistant professor at Florida Coastal School of Law in Jacksonville, FL. Among other courses, he teaches a seminar on sprawl and the law. He blogs at Planetizen and recently contributed the following post explaining his interest in sprawl. There are multiple compelling reasons to be concerned about issues related to sprawl (no shortage of related/interconnected issues either), but Lewyn gets at a very fundamental and personal issue – FREEDOM – its relevance to smart growth.
Occasionally, someone familiar with my scholarship asks me: why do you care about walkability and sprawl and cities? Why is this cause more important to you than twenty other worthy causes you might be involved in?
The answer: Freedom. I grew up in a part of Atlanta that, for a carless teenager, was essentially a minimum-security prison. There were no buses or sidewalks, as in many of Atlanta’s suburbs and pseudo-suburbs. But in my parents’ non-neighborhood, unlike in most American suburbs, there were also no lawns to walk on, so if you wanted to walk, you had to walk in the street – not a particularly safe experience in 40 mph traffic.
So I was essentially trapped in my parents’ house. (1) Long before I started thinking of street design as a public policy issue, I began to think: This is outrageous! I shouldn’t have to live this way. And when I grew up, I began to think: maybe other people shouldn’t have to live this way either.
And as a grownup, I took jobs in places like Cleveland and St. Louis. Before I moved to St. Louis in 1990, I asked a friend where to live. He said: “I do not recommend the city.” Since Atlanta contains plenty of upper-class areas (primarily because it annexed a big chunk of suburbia in 1954), I was shocked. And I asked myself: how could things have gotten to this stage? How come I can’t live in a city without living five blocks from the corner of Ghetto and Gang? And I started to read and to learn about sprawl.
Now, I live within the city limits of a relatively healthy city (Jacksonville, FL) and my city even has some well-off areas near downtown. But even here, I see things that trouble me. For example, I had an appointment at a regional planning agency yesterday. The planning agency was located in a suburban office park. I decided to experiment with the municipal bus system (which I usually take to work, but had never taken to this destination).
I was surprised and yes, shocked when I learned that I couldn’t walk the thirty-minute distance to the bus stop closest to my job. Why not? Because the office park was cut off by one limited-access highway to the south and another to the west, so there was simply no way to reach the bus stop without getting on another bus that served one of the highways and then changing buses. (2) Again, I was basically deprived of the freedom to walk to my destination.
Some people worry about sprawl primarily because they are worried about air pollution or global warming. To me, the issues is freedom. Bad street design means that in some places, you just aren’t free to move around on foot (or bike, or even bus in some areas). And urban decay and out-of-control sprawl mean that if your job or family takes you to the wrong metro area or the wrong side of town, you have to live or work in one of those places.